Page 1 of 2
Dellow bellhousing Parallel mis-alignment

Posted:
Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:26 pm
by Damion Parkin

Posted:
Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:16 pm
by gen mk 1rs2000

Posted:
Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:23 pm
by jsa

Posted:
Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:22 pm
by Damion Parkin

Posted:
Sat Nov 21, 2009 7:57 pm
by jsa

Posted:
Sat Nov 28, 2009 10:06 am
by Damion Parkin
Cheers.
With the magnetic base I have got a loan of I am unable to fit / position it in the bellhousing without touching anything when I turn the crank.
RM posted these links on the thread I started on the other forum regarding this matter.
http://www.circletrack.com/drivetrainte ... index.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Woh-fS3DJA
I have been able to do it this way.. but I am unsure if i am measuring it correctly. It doesn't matter where I position the magnetic base on the flywheel as it will be in the same spot the whole way round right ?
I marked four points (diagonals from the four bellhousing bolt holes) and measured the two sets of diagonal points. I got 7thou run out on the first set and 20thou ! on the second set. These values have been halved from the total gauge reading as the article instructs..
According to the article 5 thou is the maximum run out that is acceptable and I think Jim told me 7
I am going to unbolt a standard 4 speed bellhousing and have a crack at measuring it at some stage later today for a sanity check.
Here is a picture of what I am doing..

Posted:
Sat Nov 28, 2009 2:45 pm
by Roger Miller
Assuming the hole is round and you should check this first.
You should be able to put a bit of nice machined [bit of] steel, maybe 5 to 8mm thick under one side of magnetic base and still have accurate measurement, with a better angle of base stem out of bell/gearbox hole.
You need to find high and lows
zero dial, somewhere/anywhere
rotate crank, watching dial, for max deflection of needle , one way. When needle reaches peak/maximum measurement, mark bellhousing.
Zero dial gauge here.
rotate bellhousing, watching dial, when it gets to other maximum, read off measurement.
this will be run-out measurement

Posted:
Sun Nov 29, 2009 8:48 am
by jsa

Posted:
Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:53 am
by Paul Dunstan

Posted:
Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:41 pm
by Damion Parkin
Cheers for the replies guys.
I am going to have to do it again with a fresh mind as I checked it last night with the standard bellhousing and that was out according to my measurements aswell and I would expect the ford factory to have got it correct.
If and when I determine the amount of error what do I do about it then ? Weld up the dowel holes and have them redrilled and tapped ?? I really don't know how many people are accurate to with in 5 thou.
The bellhousing is spigoted about the gearbox just like on the standard 4 speed gearbox. Its a nice snug fit on the nose of the gearbox too.

Posted:
Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:28 am
by Cossie Phil
Not wanting to add fuel to the fire Damion, but if 2 totally different bell housings are out of alignment, you would also need to consider if the block was drilled correctly.

Posted:
Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:34 am
by Cossie Phil
Although the misalignment is easily fixed by machining the bellhousing spigot hole oversize but at the correct allignment,then machine up a spigot ring like aftermarket alloy wheels use,whach it in the freezer then drop it in place,problem solved. Your machinist could even machine a small lip or shoulder into the bellhousing and then the spigot to retain it once bolted together.

Posted:
Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:19 pm
by Damion Parkin

Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:54 pm
by Damion Parkin
Well I found a better way of setting up the magnetic base and have had a few more goes at measuring the 'run out'
I have got a consistant 45thou of run out measuring it a few different ways. No deciding what to do is the problem, as everyone that I have spoken to about solving this problem doesnt want a bar of it and I don't want to get bitten by someone I don't know.
How much of an issue could 45thou possibly present ? The clamping plate on the pressure plate is easily 2.5mm larger than the clutch plate radially...
I am tempted to just stick my head in the sand and throw it back together and address the issue properly when it arises next time.. As I don't particularly like the gearbox and I am fairly certain that the clutch is not going to like the extra power that I want to make out of the engine in the future.
Might save some more $$ and go from there.
Cheers


Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:30 pm
by Cossie Phil
.045" is 1.125mm which is massive, it will destroy input shaft bearings, 3rd/4th gear hub and synchro, cause clutch shudder and excessive wear...not good.
If you mark the runout at an x and y axis over the hole in the bellhousing, you should be able to get it machined oversize on its true centre, then have a reducing ring made back to the original hole size.
My guy would do it, but would probably cost the same as another bellhousing.
Cheers,
Phil.

Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:56 pm
by mickas
How about just putting it together and address the prblem if it arrises.
Grab the end of the input shaft, albeit you have a bit of movement in the bearing as all boxes do. I think you are over thinking a problem which hasn't occured


Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:57 pm
by Paul Dunstan
It may be easier to drill the mounting holes a little oversize and move the bell housing to it's desired location an re-dowel it?

Posted:
Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:04 am
by Damion Parkin
Yeah apparently the maximum allowable is 5thou run out so mine is out by a factor of 9! I will have to give it some more thought.
Moving the dowel holes is the way i initally considered, but this would mean welding up the original holes and re drilling and re tapping them.. and then I guess I would also need to have it refaced as it would probably warp with the heat that is put into it for welding.. I guess the final decision would come down to the machinist in question... To think that I will have to do this everytime I change blocks is a nightmare ! As my new block has been line bored.
Mickas, unfortunately the problem has already occured, I have had two gearbox rebuilds due to crunching syncros and several clutches... Even though the first few clutches I am fairly certain failed due to poor workmanship.. as they never even came close to holding up. I did 7000kms with the current clutch and when I pulled it out it had some wear, probably not enough to be an issue but i sent it back to be looked over regardless as it hadn't had much punishment.

Posted:
Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:38 pm
by Roger Miller

Posted:
Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:04 pm
by Paul Dunstan